Interactive Brokers vs Robinhood

Business model, scale, and a side-by-side Litmus framework score — which model wins, and for whom.

Robinhood wins on app simplicity and first-time US retail; IBKR wins on assets, global depth, margin pricing, and professional tooling.

At a glance

MetricInteractive BrokersRobinhood
Revenue$6.2B (FY2025)$4.5B (FY2025); $1.07B in Q1 2026
Profit~$4.4B net income (FY2025)$1.9B net income (FY2025); $346M in Q1'26
Active users4.1M+ accounts27.4M funded customers
Employees~3,000~3,800+
Founded19782013
HQGreenwich, ConnecticutMenlo Park, USA

L
Litmus Framework Score

Overall: Interactive Brokers 91 · Robinhood 82
Customer Segment
90
88
Value Proposition
95
85
Marketing Channel
80
82
Engagement
91
80
Income Source
98
86
Asset Validation
93
83
Core Operations
91
78
Strategic Alliance
81
75
Expense Validation
96
84

Interactive Brokers leads 8 modules, Robinhood leads 1. Overall edge: Interactive Brokers.

Head to head

DimensionInteractive BrokersRobinhood
Client assets / equity$780B+ client equity~$200B platform assets
Accounts4.1M+ accounts27.4M funded customers
Global market access150+ markets, 34 countriesThin international access
Product depthStocks, options, futures, FX, bonds, cryptoLimited futures/bonds/FX
Margin rate edgeFed funds + thin tiered spreadNo real margin-rate edge

FAQ

Is Interactive Brokers or Robinhood a better business?
Robinhood wins on app simplicity and first-time US retail; IBKR wins on assets, global depth, margin pricing, and professional tooling. It depends on what you optimise for — see the module-by-module breakdown above.
What is the difference between Interactive Brokers and Robinhood's business model?
Interactive Brokers operates in Fintech (The Professional's Gateway to the World's Markets), while Robinhood is Fintech (Investing for Everyone). Their revenue, scale and Litmus scores are compared in detail above.
Which is more profitable, Interactive Brokers or Robinhood?
Interactive Brokers: ~$4.4B net income (FY2025). Robinhood: $1.9B net income (FY2025); $346M in Q1'26.